80s and 90’s

The Matrix and Terminator Connection: Exploring the Alternate Timeline Theory

The Matrix and Terminator Connection: Exploring the Alternate Timeline Theory

The Matrix and Terminator are two of the most iconic science-fiction franchises in cinema history. While both have unique storylines, it is believed by some fans that they are connected through an alternate timeline theory. In this article, we will explore this theory and provide evidence that supports it. We will also discuss how this theory could change the way we view these franchises and the impact it could have on their future. The Alternate Timeline Theory The alternate timeline theory suggests that the world of The Matrix is actually a result of the events that take place in the Terminator franchise. According to this theory, the war between humans and machines in the Terminator universe resulted in the creation of Skynet, an artificial intelligence that takes over the world and attempts to eradicate humans. However, in an effort to combat Skynet, humans create their own artificial intelligence, which ultimately becomes self-aware and creates the simulated world of The Matrix as a way to control and subdue humanity. Evidence to Support the Theory While this theory may seem far-fetched, there is evidence to support it. First, both franchises deal with themes of artificial intelligence and the relationship between humans and machines. In Terminator, Skynet is a central character that is created by humans but ultimately turns on them. In The Matrix, the machines have taken over and are using humans as a source of energy. Another piece of evidence is the use of the number 101 in both franchises. In Terminator, the model number for the T-800 is 101, while in The Matrix, Neo’s apartment number is also 101. This could be a subtle nod to the connection between the two universes. Impact on the Franchises If this theory is true, it could have a significant impact on how we view both franchises. It would mean that the events in Terminator ultimately led to the creation of The Matrix, and that the war between humans and machines was not actually won by the humans, but rather by the machines themselves. This could change the way we view the characters and their motivations, as well as the overarching themes of the franchises. The Future of The Matrix and Terminator While neither franchise has confirmed the alternate timeline theory, it is possible that they could explore this idea in future installments. This could lead to a crossover between the two franchises, or even a complete reimagining of both universes. However, it could also be a risky move, as it may alienate fans who prefer the franchises to remain separate. FAQs: Q: Is there any confirmation from the creators of the franchises about this theory? A: No, there has been no confirmation from the creators of either franchise about this theory. It is purely a fan theory. Q: How does this theory affect the plot of the movies? A: If this theory is true, it would mean that the events in Terminator ultimately led to the creation of The Matrix, and that the war between humans and machines was not actually won by the humans, but rather by the machines themselves. This could change the way we view the characters and their motivations, as well as the overarching themes of the franchises. Q: Is there any evidence in the movies that supports this theory? A: There are a few pieces of evidence in the movies that support this theory, including the use of the number 101 in both franchises and the shared themes of artificial intelligence and the relationship between humans and machines. Q: How likely is it that we will see a crossover between The Matrix and Terminator? A: It is difficult to say how likely a crossover is, as it would require both franchises to agree on the theory and the direction of the crossover Text 17 February 2023 The Matrix and Terminator Connection: Exploring the Alternate Timeline Theory 17 February 2023 Harry Potter Theory: Is Ron Weasley a Seer? 16 February 2023 How ChatGPT is Revolutionizing the Gaming Industry 16 February 2023 The Tetris Movie Trailer: Release Date, Cast, Plot, and Everything We Know So Far 16 February 2023 I Am Legend 2 – A Sequel Inspired by The Last of Us and Will Smith’s Return 16 February 2023 Winnie the Pooh: Blood and Honey – A Dark and Controversial Adaptation 16 February 2023 Cocaine Bear’s People-Eating Video Game: A Highly Addictive Thrill 16 February 2023 Indiana Jones 5: Nazis, Space Race, and Harrison Ford’s Last Ride 16 February 2023 The Secret Romance of JAWS: The Scandalous Love Affair Spielberg Hid from You 15 February 2023 The Sweet Connection: Exploring How the Menu and Willy Wonka Share the Same Story

Indiana Jones and the Dial of Destiny

Indiana Jones 5: Nazis, Space Race, and Harrison Ford’s Last Ride

Hey there, movie buffs and adventure-seekers! It’s time to dust off your fedora and crack your whip because Indiana Jones is back! Yep, you heard me right. After years of waiting, Indiana Jones 5 is on its way, and here’s everything you need to know. First off, the film will be called Indiana Jones and the Dial of Destiny. So far, it looks like the plot will follow Indy’s latest adventure set in 1969. That’s right; the space race is on, and the US is determined to beat Russia to the moon. But this endeavor comes with some uncomfortable truths for Indy – the moon-landing program was run by a bunch of ex-Nazis. How “ex” they are is the question, and it seems like this fact will get up Indy’s nose. Get ready for some Nazi bashing! This time around, Indy’s goddaughter, Helena, will join him on his adventures. Phoebe Waller-Bridge will play the role, and director James Mangold describes her as a character with wonderful contradictions – charming and brilliant, but also a lot of trouble. Along with Waller-Bridge, Harrison Ford will reprise his role as Indiana Jones, and several other actors have signed on to join the cast, including Mads Mikkelsen, Toby Jones, Boyd Holbrook, Shaunette Renée Wilson, Thomas Kretschmann, and Antonio Banderas. Now, let’s get to the burning question. Who’s the villain in the film? Mikkelsen will play the role of the villainous Voller, inspired in part by real-life Nazi-turned-NASA-engineer Wernher von Braun. Holbrook plays his lackey, Klaber. Also, John Rhys-Davies’ Sallah, who was last seen in the third film, The Last Crusade, will be making his return. What’s more, for the first time in franchise history, Steven Spielberg will not be directing the movie. James Mangold will be the one behind the camera this time. But don’t worry; Spielberg remains on the project as a producer, along with Lucasfilm President Kathleen Kennedy, Frank Marshall, and Simon Emanuel. So, there you have it, folks – everything you need to know about Indiana Jones 5 so far. Although there’s not much information about the movie, we are sure that it will be an adventure worth watching. Until then, it’s time to re-watch the previous movies and perfect your fedora and whip skills. Indy’s coming, and we can’t wait to see what new adventures he has in store for us! 16 February 2023 Indiana Jones 5: Nazis, Space Race, and Harrison Ford’s Last Ride 16 February 2023 The Secret Romance of JAWS: The Scandalous Love Affair Spielberg Hid from You 15 February 2023 The Sweet Connection: Exploring How the Menu and Willy Wonka Share the Same Story 14 February 2023 Opinions Without Research: A Recipe for Misinformation and Division 14 February 2023 The Uncertain Future of Hulu: Walt Disney Company CEO Bob Iger Leaves the Door Open for Possible Sale 14 February 2023 The Shocking Theory Behind the Shooting Stars in Jaws: Why it Will Make You Want to Phone Home!  12 February 2023 Why Modern Movies are a Bunch of Disappointments (And Why We Keep Watching Them Anyway) 12 February 2023 Uncovering the Mystery: The Possibility of Tim and Lex being John Hammond’s Clones 12 February 2023 The Fuzzy Memories of Obi-Wan Kenobi: A Jedi’s Journey with Dementia 12 February 2023 The Endless Wait: Red Dead Redemption 3 and Fallout 5’s Journey to Release in the 2030s

the menu and willy wonka connection

The Sweet Connection: Exploring How the Menu and Willy Wonka Share the Same Story

Attention all you foodie film buffs out there! We’ve got a cinematic revelation that’s sure to whet your appetite. When sitting down to watch Mark Mylod’s 2022 ‘The Menu’ I never would have expected it to have so much in common with a child-hood favorite of mine about a whimsical trip through a candy factory. As it turns out the two movies that you might never have expected to be related have more in common than just their love of all things edible. That’s right, we’re talking about “The Menu” and “Willy Wonka and the Chocolate Factory.” You might think a modern-day culinary thriller and a fantastical candy-coated adventure have nothing in common, but stick with us, because we’re about to prove that these two movies are practically culinary cousins. So grab a snack, settle in, and let’s dive into the surprisingly delicious connections between these two unlikely movies. We all know the plot and theme of the beloved classic Willy Wonka and the Chocolate Factory, but once I started watching ‘The Menu’ the similarities were glaring. As we know, Willy Wonka and the Chocolate Factory” is based on the beloved children’s book by Roald Dahl, which tells the story of a poor young boy named Charlie Bucket who wins a tour of the mysterious and magical chocolate factory owned by the eccentric candy maker, Willy Wonka. The movie follows Charlie and four other children as they tour the factory and learn valuable lessons about greed, selfishness, and the importance of family. Along the way, the children are tempted by the factory’s incredible delights, but only Charlie proves himself worthy to inherit the factory and become Willy Wonka’s successor. The Menu” is a dark thriller that follows the story of foodie Tyler Ledford and his date Margot Mills as they attend an exclusive dinner at the restaurant Hawthorn, owned and operated by celebrity chef Julian Slowik on a private island. As the dinner progresses, unsettling truths about the guests are exposed, a sous-chef kills himself, and things spiral out of control. Slowik reveals that each guest was invited because they contributed to his losing his passion for cooking. He announces that everyone present will be dead by the end of the night. Margot is unmasked as an escort, and Tyler is revealed to have known about the dinner’s deadly intentions. Margot escapes the island while Slowik and his staff set the restaurant ablaze, killing themselves and the guests. At first glance they are seemingly unrelated, but here are the similarities: Both films feature a group of privileged visitors showing up to an exclusive location ready to gorge themselves on delicious treats. In both films they start with a tour of the facilities and get the run-down on the various stages of production and ingredients. They both feature a culinary genius madman who rules over a team of devoted underlings assisting with the creation of their masterpieces.These madmen are famous and enigmatic, both seem to live in a world full of mystery and solitude who take their jobs a little too seriously. All seems fine until the cracks start showing and we see that the man in charge is a little unhinged. They both start speaking in riddles and it seems like these visitors are more captives than guests. Immoralities are revealed about each guest as misfortune befalls them. All while the Wonka/The Chef act as if the show must go on. As if it was all part of the plan. In Willy Wonka, we know Charlie is out of place. He lives a humble life in poverty with his mother and grandparents so much so that he couldn’t even afford a chocolate bar to gain a chance at winning access through a golden ticket.  But in The Menu, we are only slightly aware at first that ‘Margot’ is out of her element, she’s shocked at the price point for admission to the island, she seems unimpressed by the lavish lifestyles of the others in attendance, and finally The Chef tells her,  she’s “not supposed to be here” and reveals that she is in fact a ‘call girl’ and like himself, she is from poverty. Both madmen seem perturbed by the gluttonous nature of the entitled,  both reveal that they intend to retire from their jobs of creating culinary delights, and both seem to have a soft spot for our underdog protagonist. They see the protagonist as different from the rest of the entitled guests and seem to relate to them. Both protagonists go against the guy in charge and betray his trust, going into an off-limits area and making use of  something not intended for them. In Willy Wonka, Charlie and Grandpa drink ‘Fizzy Lifting Drinks’ and in ‘The Menu’ Margot used a CB radio to call for help. This infuriates Wonka/The Chef and they lump our protagonist in with the rest of the group considering them (As Chef says) “Takers, not givers.”  In Willy Wonka, after Wonka reveals Charlie isn’t going to receive his winnings, Grandpa calls Wonka an “Inhuman monster.” In The Menu The Chef admits he, himself, is a monster. Then our protagonist makes one final play, Margot asks Chef to make her a cheeseburger, and Charlie places the Ever-lasting Gobstopper on Wonka’s half-desk, revealing to both the sincere, honest nature of the protagonist, making Chef/Wonka remember their love of their craft. As Wonka states “So shines a good deed in a weary world…” Margot is allowed to escape, Charlie wins the factory and both protagonists are last seen traveling away from their prison on a vessel, looking back at what could have been a disaster.   In conclusion, “The Menu” and “Willy Wonka and the Chocolate Factory” are both wonderful in their own right, keep you on the edge of your seat and convey a sense of mystery and foreboding righteousness. Both films share many similarities despite being vastly different in genre and tone. Both feature privileged guests indulging in an exclusive culinary experience, overseen …

The Sweet Connection: Exploring How the Menu and Willy Wonka Share the Same Story Read More »

Chief Brody from "Jaws" Shooting Star

The Shocking Theory Behind the Shooting Stars in Jaws: Why it Will Make You Want to Phone Home! 

“Jaws,” the 1975 thriller directed by Steven Spielberg, has captivated audiences for decades with its gripping storytelling and unforgettable scenes. Among these memorable moments is the scene in which Chief Brody, Hooper, and Quint are on the boat, exchanging stories about their scars. During the conversation, Quint mentions that he was on the USS Indianapolis when it went down and described the horrific aftermath of the attack. As he tells the story, he says, “Sometimes, that shark, he looks right into you, right into your eyes, and you know the thing about a shark, he’s got… lifeless eyes, black eyes, like a doll’s eyes.” But it’s not just Quint’s chilling tale that has captured viewers’ attention over the years. It’s also the shooting stars that appear in the sky above them. Some fans have speculated that these shooting stars were not just a part of the scene’s aesthetics but were actually a subtle reference to Spielberg’s future film “E.T. the Extra-Terrestrial,” which was released six years later in 1982. In “E.T.,” the titular alien points to the sky while using his communicator to contact his home planet, saying he’s trying to “phone home.” During this scene, several shooting stars can be seen in the sky, similar to those in “Jaws.” Some viewers believe this connection between the two films was intentional on Spielberg’s part and serves as a small but meaningful piece of film history. While Spielberg himself has not confirmed this theory, the idea of a hidden reference between the two films is an intriguing possibility. Spielberg is known for his attention to detail and ability to weave small elements into his films to create a larger narrative universe. The shooting stars in “Jaws” and “E.T.” could be seen as an example of this style of storytelling.  Additionally, the connection between “Jaws” and “E.T.” may not be as tenuous as it seems. Both films share a common thread of humanity overcoming fear and finding hope in unexpected places. This common theme serves as a reminder of Spielberg’s unique storytelling style, which has resonated with audiences for generations. While the connection between the shooting stars in “Jaws” and “E.T.” remains a matter of viewer speculation, it represents the enduring impact of Spielberg’s work on popular culture. Whether intentional or not, the shooting stars serve as a small but memorable piece of film history and a testament to Spielberg’s ability to craft intricate narratives across multiple films. 14 February 2023 The Uncertain Future of Hulu: Walt Disney Company CEO Bob Iger Leaves the Door Open for Possible Sale 14 February 2023 The Shocking Theory Behind the Shooting Stars in Jaws: Why it Will Make You Want to Phone Home!  12 February 2023 Why Modern Movies are a Bunch of Disappointments (And Why We Keep Watching Them Anyway) 12 February 2023 Uncovering the Mystery: The Possibility of Tim and Lex being John Hammond’s Clones 12 February 2023 The Fuzzy Memories of Obi-Wan Kenobi: A Jedi’s Journey with Dementia 12 February 2023 The Endless Wait: Red Dead Redemption 3 and Fallout 5’s Journey to Release in the 2030s 11 February 2023 Padame Did Not Die of a Broken Heart 11 February 2023 Could Don Draper be the infamous D.B. Cooper? 11 February 2023 The Goku Coma Theory – Was it all Just a Dream? 10 February 2023 Did ‘The Flintstones’ Actually Take Place In A Post-Apocalyptic Hellscape?

Uncovering the Mystery: The Possibility of Tim and Lex being John Hammond's Clones

Uncovering the Mystery: The Possibility of Tim and Lex being John Hammond’s Clones

John Hammond, the founder and CEO of InGen, was a man with a vision. He dreamed of creating a theme park filled with genetically engineered dinosaurs, which would be the biggest attraction in the world. He was a brilliant man, but he also had a secret that not many people knew about. Tim and Lex, two siblings who were among the main characters in the original “Jurassic Park” film, may in fact be John Hammond’s clones. One of the main arguments for this theory is that we never see Tim and Lex’s parents in the film. This has led many fans to speculate that they were either adopted or, in this case, created in a lab. Another piece of evidence is the fact that Tim and Lex are willing to travel to a dangerous and remote island to visit a theme park, despite the fact that there are live dinosaurs on the loose. This could be seen as a testament to their bravery, but it could also be seen as a sign that they have a deeper connection to the park and its creator, John Hammond. So, how could John Hammond have used the dinosaur lab with his own DNA to make Tim and Lex? The answer lies in the cutting-edge technology that he had at his disposal. John Hammond was a man who was always looking for ways to push the boundaries of science and technology, and he may have seen the opportunity to create life in the lab as a means of fulfilling his own ambitions. It’s also possible that John Hammond was not just interested in creating a theme park filled with genetically engineered dinosaurs, but also in creating a new form of life that was tied to his own DNA. This would have given him complete control over the park and its inhabitants, as well as a sense of legacy that would live on long after he was gone. As for why he would have created Tim and Lex specifically, it’s possible that he saw them as a way of ensuring that his vision would continue even after he was gone. Perhaps he believed that having his own children would give him the power to ensure that the park would be run the way he wanted it to be run, even after he was no longer there to oversee it. The fact that Tim and Lex are willing to put themselves in harm’s way to visit the park could also be seen as a sign of their connection to John Hammond. They may have felt that they had a responsibility to help protect the park and its inhabitants, as well as to ensure that the legacy of John Hammond would live on. Of course, this theory is purely speculative, and there is no concrete evidence to support it. However, it does provide an interesting new perspective on the “Jurassic Park” franchise, and raises important questions about the role of science and technology in our lives. Regardless of whether or not Tim and Lex are actually John Hammond’s clones, the “Jurassic Park” franchise has left a lasting impact on popular culture and has inspired countless people to think about the power of science and the importance of respecting the natural world. It’s a testament to the enduring legacy of John Hammond, and a reminder of the impact that one man’s vision can have on the world. 12 February 2023 Uncovering the Mystery: The Possibility of Tim and Lex being John Hammond’s Clones 12 February 2023 The Fuzzy Memories of Obi-Wan Kenobi: A Jedi’s Journey with Dementia 12 February 2023 The Endless Wait: Red Dead Redemption 3 and Fallout 5’s Journey to Release in the 2030s 11 February 2023 Padame Did Not Die of a Broken Heart 11 February 2023 Could Don Draper be the infamous D.B. Cooper? 11 February 2023 The Goku Coma Theory – Was it all Just a Dream? 10 February 2023 Did ‘The Flintstones’ Actually Take Place In A Post-Apocalyptic Hellscape? 10 February 2023 101 Dalmatians (1961) – Was Anita in on the Puppy Heist? 03 February 2023 Here Are The Most Anticipated Games Coming 2023 So Far 03 February 2023 The Boys Ratings Leave Every Marvel Show in the Dust

obi wan memory loss

The Fuzzy Memories of Obi-Wan Kenobi: A Jedi’s Journey with Dementia

“Memory is a curious thing, isn’t it?” says Obi-Wan Kenobi, scratching his bearded chin. “One moment, it’s crystal clear, and the next, it’s as foggy as a Tatooine sandstorm.” And when it comes to our dear old Obi-Wan, it seems that his memory may be a little more foggy than we initially thought. You see, when Luke Skywalker asks about his father, Obi-Wan tells him that he trained Anakin Skywalker and that he was betrayed and murdered by Darth Vader. But when he encounters R2-D2 and C-3PO on Tatooine, he acts as if he’s never seen the droids before. And when Luke mentions that they belong to his father, Obi-Wan simply says, “Your father? How would I know that?” Now, some may argue that Obi-Wan was simply playing dumb to protect Luke from the truth about Darth Vader. But what if it’s not just an act? What if Obi-Wan genuinely doesn’t remember ever having met R2-D2 and C-3PO, or even Anakin Skywalker for that matter? Could it be that our wise old Jedi Master is suffering from some form of memory loss or dementia? It’s a possibility that we cannot ignore. After all, he’s been through a lot in his life, from fighting in the Clone Wars to hiding from the Empire on Tatooine. The stress of such events can take a toll on a person’s memory. But why would he lie to Luke about his father? Well, it’s possible that his memory loss is causing him to mix up details and that he genuinely believes that Anakin was betrayed and murdered by Darth Vader. Or, he may have lied to protect Luke and himself, knowing that the truth about Vader would be too much for the young Jedi to handle. Regardless of the reason, it’s clear that something is not quite right with Obi-Wan’s memory. And while it may be a sensitive subject, it’s important to address it so that we can better understand and appreciate the character. So, what do we do about it? Well, for starters, we need to acknowledge that memory loss and dementia are not something to be ashamed of. They are a natural part of aging and can happen to anyone, even Jedi Masters. We need to approach the subject with compassion and understanding, and support those who are struggling with it. In the end, whether it’s due to stress, aging, or something else entirely, Obi-Wan’s memory loss is a reminder that even the wisest and strongest among us are not immune to the effects of time. And while it may change the way we see him, it does not diminish his impact on the Star Wars universe or the lessons that he taught us about the power of the Force and the importance of standing up for what is right. So, let’s raise a glass to the memory of our dear old Jedi Master, Obi-Wan Kenobi, and to the memories that we hold dear. May the Force be with us, always. 12 February 2023 The Fuzzy Memories of Obi-Wan Kenobi: A Jedi’s Journey with Dementia 12 February 2023 The Endless Wait: Red Dead Redemption 3 and Fallout 5’s Journey to Release in the 2030s 11 February 2023 Padame Did Not Die of a Broken Heart 11 February 2023 Could Don Draper be the infamous D.B. Cooper? 11 February 2023 The Goku Coma Theory – Was it all Just a Dream? 10 February 2023 Did ‘The Flintstones’ Actually Take Place In A Post-Apocalyptic Hellscape? 10 February 2023 101 Dalmatians (1961) – Was Anita in on the Puppy Heist? 03 February 2023 Here Are The Most Anticipated Games Coming 2023 So Far 03 February 2023 The Boys Ratings Leave Every Marvel Show in the Dust 03 February 2023 BIG Stable Steam Deck Update

padame dead

Padame Did Not Die of a Broken Heart

It’s incredible that one of the biggest plot points in Star Wars history was explained away by a mere broken heart, and just like that it’s case closed and never talked about again. It’s literally the f*cking Jeffrey Epstein of Star Wars. Since 2005 there has been a growing amount of Star Wars fans that are debating the events that concluded the prequel series, which is arguably the best in the series “Revenge of the Sith”. Fans have been speculating that there is no way that Padme was killed by a broken heart, and we’re here to tell you that this was absolutely NOT the case.  The only time someone says anything about this “broken heart” is when SHE says it while she was begging Anakin to stop his attack on the Jedi. Which sure this could break your heart to know that the love of your live, the father of your unborn children is a mass murdering maniac.  At this moment Anakin is admitting that he’s turned against them, shacking up with Palpatine’s takeover, and then eventually plotting to overthrow him, Padame collapses, but the big million dollar question is would that be enough to kill her?  We Say Nay But Could Have it Been Anakin’s Force Choke?  As shady as a move as this was, and as angry as Anakin was with Padme siding with Obi-Wan, he did let her go. Even though they were trying to kill him he releases her, and the movie goes through great lengths to show you that she very clearly survives his attack. You can even see her breathing as she’s unconscious on the floor. Then Obi-Wan gets back on the ship after leaving Anakin half the man he used to be, and we see that her breathing once again. Now is it possible that this could have been the cause of her death…maybe, but the film reaffirms more than once that this was not the cause of her death. The Hell Do Droids Know About the Force Anyway?  After Padme gets to Polis Massa she is immediately taken to a medical bay and is cared for by medical droids. Now let’s get one thing straight: Droids don’t know Squat About The Force. They don’t even know about it unless it’s been specifically programmed into them. You can clearly see that whatever was happening with Padme had to do with The Force and if you remember the exact words the droid said were as follows. DROID “Medically, she’s completely healthy. For reasons we can’t explain, we’re losing her.”  Obi-Wan “She’s dying?!”  DROID “ We don’t know why. She’s lost the will to live. We need to operate quickly if we are to save the babies”   Let’s break this down “For reasons we can’t explain, we’re losing her.” The reason is The Force “We don’t know why. She’s lost the will to live.” Almost like her connection with the living Force was being cut off? Obviously the droids would not be able to pick that up! Was Padme not the type to actually struggle the entire time? Wasn’t she fighting to stay conscious all the way through to the bitter end of the birth of her children, it’s pretty obvious that her will to live was incredibly strong. Then question then comes down to why was her Life Force being torn away, seemingly siphoned off by a Force Vampire, could it be possible that this is the power of someone who would be able to control the Forces of life and death? Even able to cheat it? This is definitely starting to sound like someone I know… Remember the story of Darth Plagueis the Wise? Well Palpatine certainly did, so much so he learned the powers of his old master and killed him off when there was nothing more he could acquire from him. So, this means while Anakin was laying burnt to a crisp on Mustafar, Palpatine was sucking the Life Force from Padme and then in turn giving it to Anakin. So, Padme died so Anakin could be reborn as Darth Vader! “I Sense Lord Vader is in Danger”  So the question remains, how the hell Palpatine could effect Padme when she’s on Polis Massa? Remember when Palpatine was battling Yoda? Well he knew something was wrong with Anakin while he was all the way out on Mustafar. Remember this is the day that Palpatine was at the height of his power, when the Dark Side of The Force was the strongest in him. Completely blindsiding the Jedi, who are fighting this rise in the Dark Side. If he was aware of what was going on with Anakin on Mustafar then certainly he was capable of reaching Padme on Polis Massa. “But She Was Alive. I Felt It”  Darth Vader rises, he’s not the same man that was Anakin Skywalker. He’s been beaten, burned, and definitely did NOT have the High Ground. The only thing possibly keeping him alive is the Life Force that had been taken from Padme and given to him, brought to you by the Master of Dark Arts and one evil son-of-a-bitch. This is not some crazy coincidence that Padme had died the exact moment that Darth Vader is born, and the first thing that he does is ask about Padme. Anakin, remember, was awake through the entirety of the procedure that saved his life and during it he could feel Padme’s Life Force. He knew the whole time that the Force Choke did not kill his wife. Palpatine: “Lord Vader, can you hear me?”  Vader: “Yes Master. Where is Padme? Is she safe? Is she alright?”  Palpatine: “It seems, in your anger, you killed her.”  Vader: “I-I couldn’t have. She was ALIVE-I FELT IT.”  *Palpatine Smiles*  Vader: “NOOOOOOOOOOO…”  The evidence is clear, Anakin knew that she was still alive and then felt her Life Force leave her. The Emperor smiles in satisfaction, but there is one more SOLID piece of evidence to back all of …

Padame Did Not Die of a Broken Heart Read More »

goku coma

The Goku Coma Theory – Was it all Just a Dream?

Ever wonder why Dragon Ball Super has so many inconsistencies and conveniences? Why the series seems to be so carefree, happy, and catered towards Goku? Hold on to your dragon balls, because we’re about to embark on a fantastic journey exploring one of the most intriguing fan theories about Goku from the original Dragon Ball series. Is it possible that Kid Goku has been in a coma for all these years? One fan theory suggests that this is completely possible, and even though the original creepypasta author had deleted the theory, but one blogger re-writes the theory from memory. This theory claims that during the scene in the original Dragon Ball story, the moment Goku hits his head on a rock he slips into a deep coma, and everything and everyone he comes accross in his comatose dream state, are all just representations of things that Goku wants. Beginning with the characters we see in Dragon Ball such as Master Roshi, who is Goku’s hope of becoming stronger and learning new things. This is evident during his mastering of the Kamehameha wave. The maximum power lever that Master Roshi has represents Goku’s desire to become even more powerful and ultimately surpassing any normal limitations. Krillin is Goku’s want of a best friend that he currently did not have, and the need of a rival who would push him to become even stronger than he was before meeting him. The Ox King is also what Goku would imagine himself growing up to look like, which is kind of a stretch but we won’t hold that against OP. Bulma on the other hand is Goku’s curiosity of his sexual nature and his need to become smarter. Which is why we have multiple scenes where Bulma is being represented in a sexual way, and the same goes for Chi Chi who plays on this sexual curiosity, who will later come to be his ideal wife. Lastly we come to the Demon King Piccolo who represents all of Goku’s deepest fears at the time. Could this be the equivalent of a comatose nightmare?   Moving on to Dragon Ball Z. Goku has been in a coma for some years now and through his dreaming we eventually come to Bardock who he imagines to be his father, which is why he looks so much like our hero because…you guessed it, he’s his father. The Saiyan race is also the mental representation of Goku’s need to fit in somewhere because he feels like this would be the only group he would relate to because of his tail, but they are a proud angry race, and they’re also incredibly powerful because he remembers his own aggressive nature. Vegeta is who Goku would imagine would be his ideal rival from this Saiyan race, and the reason Vegeta is always bested by Goku is because unlike Goku, Vegeta thinks very highly of himself. Frieza is all the fears that Goku must ultimately face, and when he kills Krillin he created an ascended version of himself and calls it Super Saiyan. King Kai is Goku’s need for guidance, who helps Goku down the long road of this coma he is currently in, and who may ultimately help him awake from this very long sleep. Gohan is obviously the ideal son who Goku wants to have a successful life, and Goten being his own innocence in child form, who is as strong as he wishes he was right now. Trunks represents his fears of the future, and along with him the cyborgs being his own fears of technology that he doesn’t quite understand. This also represents his fear of what can come from this unknown technology. Which brings us to Majin Buu who is Goku’s own gluttony and childhood innocence that eventually turns into a nightmare because of his own fear of hurting the one’s he loves. The different forms of Super Saiyan are the representation of Goku pushing his power level to the maximum potential which also goes hand in hand with the Fusion characters such as Gogeta and Vegito, this is all just Goku exploring new heights as he works together with himself and his allies. Vegito is more of his own cocky side where as Gogeta is his more earnest side of himself when he wants to take things a little more seriously. Now this theory may seem a little far fetched and anyone can make a coma story out of any animated if we’re being honest, but it’s just a fun theory to thing about. What do you guys think? You can sound off in the forum section where we’ll be adding a discussion about this theory. 11 February 2023 The Goku Coma Theory – Was it all Just a Dream? 10 February 2023 Did ‘The Flintstones’ Actually Take Place In A Post-Apocalyptic Hellscape? 10 February 2023 101 Dalmatians (1961) – Was Anita in on the Puppy Heist? 03 February 2023 Here Are The Most Anticipated Games Coming 2023 So Far 03 February 2023 The Boys Ratings Leave Every Marvel Show in the Dust 03 February 2023 BIG Stable Steam Deck Update 02 February 2023 Ark Survival Evolved is getting Remastered! 04 January 2023 Gamers File Lawsuit to Halt Microsoft’s proposed acquisition of Activision Blizzard 04 January 2023 The Joker and Harley VS Gomez and Morticia – Toxic vs Timeless 04 January 2023 Hogwarts Legacy Update

The flintstones post apocalypse

Did ‘The Flintstones’ Actually Take Place In A Post-Apocalyptic Hellscape?

Hold onto your Bronto-Burgers, folks, because we’re about to go on a wild ride through the streets of Bedrock! You remember that classic cartoon from the 80s and 90s, don’t you? The one that showed us how families lived in the Stone Age, with their animal-powered machinery, crude tools, and simple way of life? Well, what if I told you that everything we thought we knew about the Flintstones was a lie? That they weren’t living in the Stone Age at all, but instead, in a dystopian post-apocalyptic wasteland that had been bombed back to the Stone Age? Let’s start with the evidence. First of all, we have the 1987 TV movie “The Jetsons Meet the Flintstones.” In the movie, Elroy Jetson creates a time machine that malfunctions and sends him and his family into the past. But what if it wasn’t the past they traveled to? What if, instead, they traveled to the future, a future beyond their understanding? And that future just happened to look like the Stone Age. Think about it. If there was a major cataclysmic event that caused the world to revert back to the Stone Age, it would make sense that the surviving animal species would get a fresh start in this new world. They wouldn’t be hunted by humans anymore, and they would have the opportunity to flourish and evolve. Some of them might even gain sentience. That would explain why the Flintstones have all of these amazing animal-powered machines like a pig that lives under their sink as a garbage disposal, a micro-elephant on wheels used as a vacuum cleaner, or a bird’s beak used as a record player. And all of them are able to break the 4th wall in perfect English to complain about their jobs. And speaking of modernity, let’s talk about Christmas. The Flintstones celebrate this holiday, which is more than just putting presents under the tree and kissing under the mistletoe. It’s a celebration of the birth of Jesus Christ. But wait a minute, didn’t we think the Flintstones were living in the Stone Age, long before the birth of Christ? How could they celebrate Christmas AND be living in a time of pre-history? This just adds to the evidence that these characters aren’t who or what we thought they were. Another piece of evidence is the fact that the Flintstones have a sophisticated and robust economy. They don’t operate on a trading or bartering system, but instead have money and a complicated banking system. They even have deposit slips that they fill out with a rock and chisel. And their currency looks strikingly modern-day, with some Illuminati symbolism printed on it. To have a functioning economy, they would have had to have the ability to produce ink, which wouldn’t have been readily available in the aftermath of the initial fallout. Finally, let’s consider the timing of the Flintstones. The cartoon first aired from 1960 to 1966, during the peak of the Cold War. What if the showdown between the United States and the Soviet Union happened and the world was plunged into a post-apocalyptic wasteland, with only the remnants of society left to rebuild from the ashes? The Flintstones could be a glimpse into that future. In conclusion, when you take all of these pieces of evidence into consideration, it’s possible that the Flintstones weren’t living in the Stone Age after all, but in a post-apocalyptic wasteland, using what was available to them to rebuild their world in the image of what they remembered from the past. The next time you watch an episode of The Flintstones, think about all of these hidden secrets, and you might see the cartoon in a whole new light. 10 February 2023 Did ‘The Flintstones’ Actually Take Place In A Post-Apocalyptic Hellscape? 10 February 2023 101 Dalmatians (1961) – Was Anita in on the Puppy Heist? 03 February 2023 Here Are The Most Anticipated Games Coming 2023 So Far 03 February 2023 The Boys Ratings Leave Every Marvel Show in the Dust 03 February 2023 BIG Stable Steam Deck Update 02 February 2023 Ark Survival Evolved is getting Remastered! 04 January 2023 Gamers File Lawsuit to Halt Microsoft’s proposed acquisition of Activision Blizzard 04 January 2023 The Joker and Harley VS Gomez and Morticia – Toxic vs Timeless 04 January 2023 Hogwarts Legacy Update 04 January 2023 E3 is Back this Year: What we Know so Far.

101 Dalmatians Anita

101 Dalmatians (1961) – Was Anita in on the Puppy Heist?

Ah, the enigmatic and elusive Anita Radcliffe! The Disney movie “101 Dalmatians” is full of colorful characters, but this lady takes the cake for being one of the most mysterious and ambiguous of them all. Sure, we know that she has a Dalmatian and likes to read in the park, but beyond that, it’s anyone’s guess as to what’s going on in her mind. But don’t be fooled by her lack of dialogue and actions – Anita’s character is displayed through the things she doesn’t say or do. According to reddit user u/gascanfiasco‘s fantheory Anita my be hiding a dark secret. Was she wealthy, maybe from a family with money?  And could she have actually been in cahoots with her evil friend from school, Cuella da Vil? This theory suggests she could have been. First of all, let’s talk about Anita’s background. We’re first introduced to Roger, who’s living in a run-down apartment. But once he marries Anita, they move into a spacious townhouse with multiple rooms, a nanny, and all the bells and whistles! Pongo describes it as a “modest little place”, but it’s a far cry from where Roger and he used to live. Now, let’s consider that Roger’s songs are yet to be recognized, so it’s not like he’s making a ton of money just yet. So, one might wonder, where did they get all the funds to live in such a lavish lifestyle? That money must have come from Anita somehow. Cruella obviously comes from money and if her and Anita attended the same school it’s safe to assume they both come from affluent families. Later on in the movie, when Roger’s songs become a hit, Anita mentions how the money brought in was more than they could ever imagine. But there’s not a single change in their house, clothing, or lifestyle. It seems like they were doing just fine without all the extra cash.  Now, let’s talk about Anita’s indifference. Right before Cruella makes her grand entrance, Perdita freaks out and hides. As a pet owner, you would expect Anita to notice, but nope! Cruella walks in, smoking a smelly cigarette that Anita obviously dislikes, and even extinguishes it in a cupcake when Anita offers her tea– but still, not a peep from Anita. It’s like she doesn’t even care. And when Cruella mocks her home, social status, and husband, she still doesn’t say a word. It’s almost as if she’s indifferent to the whole situation. But wait, it gets even more interesting! After Pongo’s conversation with Perdita about being pregnant, Cruella just shows up, asking to see the puppies. How in the world did she know about them? And why didn’t Anita seem concerned that Cruella, known for her love of fur coats, was asking about the puppies? This should have been a red flag but Anita acts as if this behavior is expected. When the puppies are born, Cruella shows up again right on cue and tries to buy them. She bullies Anita and belittles Roger, and for a moment, it seems like Anita is standing up for the puppies. But then, something strange happens. Right before Roger stands up to Cruella, she accidentally splashes ink all over him and Pongo, making them covered in spots, just like a Dalmatian. But Anita? Not a single spot on her. Even when Cruella pulls out her checkbook, Anita doesn’t say a word. It’s almost like she’s in on the whole thing. Fast-forward to when the puppies are stolen, Roger is sure it was Cruella, but Anita tells him that Cruella isn’t a thief. But, come on now, we all know what she’s capable of. She runs a business that kills and skins furry animals and Cruella is openly passionate about her love of furs. And why did Anita inform Cruella of Perdita’s pregnancy and the puppies’ delivery? Why did she go silent when the checkbook came out? The answer to these questions remains a mystery, but one thing’s for sure – Anita’s loyalties are definitely questionable. She could be in on the whole thing. Or at the very least she could be happy to be rid of the puppies. Either way, we have our eye on you Anita! 10 February 2023 101 Dalmatians (1961) – Was Anita in on the Puppy Heist? 03 February 2023 Here Are The Most Anticipated Games Coming 2023 So Far 03 February 2023 The Boys Ratings Leave Every Marvel Show in the Dust 03 February 2023 BIG Stable Steam Deck Update 02 February 2023 Ark Survival Evolved is getting Remastered! 04 January 2023 Gamers File Lawsuit to Halt Microsoft’s proposed acquisition of Activision Blizzard 04 January 2023 The Joker and Harley VS Gomez and Morticia – Toxic vs Timeless 04 January 2023 Hogwarts Legacy Update 04 January 2023 E3 is Back this Year: What we Know so Far. 03 January 2023 World of Warcraft: Dragonflight

Scroll to Top